Energy--having physical and mental stamina enough to complete the task at hand--is a necessary but insufficient condition of completion. To this end, Robert Peters writes about scope in Getting What You Came For: The Smart Student's Guide to Earning a Master's or a Ph.D. An incorrectly-scoped project can quickly overwhelm both author and work, and sap energy away from both.
And this is an excellent point that Peters makes very clear. Contrasting with the approach books like Zinsser's On Writing Well and Bolker's Writing Your Dissertation in Fifteen Minutes a Day: A Guide to Starting, Revising, and Finishing Your Doctoral Thesis, which coach writers to touch the manuscript every day to increase its bulk (for later revision), Peters spends more time with the reader talking about scope and illustrates with his own nearly-derailed dissertation.
In short, filling pages with words are necessary, but dangerous if the project is over-scoped. In fact, the common traits of the very best faculty members with whom I have worked was knowing where to focus (and with which words), and when to stop (project scope).
What techniques, if any, do you use to remove the guilt of not doing Y while trying to attend to X?
No comments:
Post a Comment